Scotland: conversion therapy proposals are ‘a danger’
Luke Randall
400 people attended the Christian Institute’s ‘Let Us Pray’ conference at Newton Mearns Baptist Church, Glasgow, where they discussed the Scottish Government's 'dangerous' proposals to end conversion practices in Scotland.
The event featured three talks and a question-and-answer session. Mike Judge of Chorlton Evangelical Church, Manchester led the first talk, which focused on the centrality of conversion to the Christian faith, before Professor David Galloway, Chairman of Logos Scotland and the former President of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow spoke about how the Scottish Government’s proposals relate to parenting and the ordinary work of churches.
Conversion therapy: ‘signs are not good’
Nicola Laver
The Scottish Government is consulting on a far-reaching ‘conversion therapy’ ban on ‘any effort to change, suppress or inhibit a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity’.
The proposals include a new civil protection order that could be used ‘for preventing harm caused by individuals or institutions that conduct conversion practices on a wider scale’.
Hopes rise for dropping of conversion therapy ban
Nicola Laver
There is increasing optimism that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak will drop plans to introduce a conversion therapy ban, five years after it was proposed by former PM Theresa May. However, while some MPs and LGBT activists who have make clear they will increase pressure on the government to introduce a ban, a Christian Institute poll revealed only a tiny proportion of voters want one.
Proponents of a ban are not giving up easily. Dehenna Davison, MP for Bishop Auckland, who is bisexual, told activists at September’s Tory Party Conference Pride Reception – hosted by LGBT+ Conservatives and Stonewall - to ‘be noisy’ in making it known the ban must be ‘followed through’.
Conversion therapy bill is 'badly drafted'
The Westminster Government first pledged to criminalise so-called "conversion therapy" in 2018 under Theresa May.
It was a knee-jerk response to activists making unverified claims of grim abuses they alleged were taking place in churches. But the Conservatives came to realise that the evidence base didn’t stack up. They also couldn’t legally define the bogeyman conjured up by activists.