Assisted suicide: a clash of two worldviews

James Mildred  |  Features  |  politics & policy
Date posted:  1 May 2024
Share Add       
Assisted suicide: a clash  of two worldviews

When worlds collide | image: iStock

In a column for The Times, commentator Matthew Parris said that legalising assisted suicide would put pressure on older people and those with a terminal illness to end their lives. In his view, this is a good thing.

In a similar article for the The Spectator, he said that legalising assisted suicide was simply the outworking of Darwinian social thought. Our moral codes, he argued, are driven by the Darwinian notion of the fight for survival, whether we accept this or not.

Mr Parris is to be commended for his honesty. In the assisted suicide debate, the pro-assisted suicide lobby often uses euphemisms and deception to advance its cause. Consider the deliberate employment of the term ‘assisted dying’, which no Christian should ever use.

Share
< Previous article| Features| Next article >
Read more articles on:   assisted suicide  /  politics
Read more articles by James Mildred >>
Comment
Why can we never support assisted suicide?

Why can we never support assisted suicide?

This month, the Westminster Parliament will be prorogued and a King’s Speech should take place after the local elections on …

Comment
Scotland's assisted suicide vote: 'A victory for the vulnerable'

Scotland's assisted suicide vote: 'A victory for the vulnerable'

I spent yesterday evening watching the Scottish Parliament debate assisted suicide. It was a Stage Three debate, which is the …

About en

Our vision, values and history

Read more

Need to advertise?

We can help you reach Christians across the country

Find out more