Soft-edge apologetics

Chris Sinkinson  |  Features  |  defending our faith
Date posted:  1 Dec 2011
Share Add       

This year saw the controversial publication of Rob Bell’s Love Wins.

It received plenty of media attention, including an insightful review by Nick Pollard in EN. Bell’s NOOMA series of videos and lavishly illustrated books have created an enthusiastic following. Even before its release, the book was generating controversy. Was Rob Bell about to endorse the doctrine of universalism: that all people will one day be saved? In the US, the publishers were aware of the sales potential.

They had Bell appearing on various mainstream secular TV and radio shows to promote his ideas. No, he was not a universalist. Yes, he thought God might one day save all people. No, he was not a heretic. Yes, he wanted to emphasise love, hope, inclusiveness and an optimistic Christianity. Was this a great media opportunity for the gospel? Is this the kind of apologetics that our world needs? A Christianity without the hard edges, a gospel for the breakfast TV sofa?

Share
< Previous article| Features| Next article >
Read more articles by Chris Sinkinson >>
Features
AI shedding new light on  ancient texts

AI shedding new light on ancient texts

From 1947, the recovery of fragments of Biblical texts in the region of the Dead Sea became one of the …

Features
See where they laid Him?

See where they laid Him?

Recent archaeological discoveries in Jerusalem are helping to pinpoint the location of the crucifixion of Jesus.The place of the …

Looking for a job?

Browse all our current job adverts

Search

New here?

Register and get three free articles each month!

Register