There’s a row gathering over student loans, and I can’t help but feel somewhat personally culpable.
Back in 2013 as a new graduate – soon after tuition fees had been raised from £3,000 to £9,000 per year – I did a three-month job giving presentations about student finance in sixth forms and colleges.
I can still remember the patter. In each presentation, after briefly sharing what a great time I myself had at university (with photos!) I cheerfully explained the costs and terms of the new “Plan 2” student loans. “It’s really not that bad,” was the overall gist of it: graduates would be charged interest rate of the Retail Price Index (then about 3%), plus an additional 1, 2 or 3% (based on earnings). Once they’d graduated, their repayments would be set at 9% of all their earnings over a given threshold (then £21,000 per year). “So, if you leave uni and get a good graduate job paying £25k per year,” I would say – although it sounded like a fancifully princely sum to me at the time – “that would work out at about £30 a month. Which, when you think about it, is about what you’d pay for a gym membership or mobile phone contract.” And after 30 years, the loan would be wiped.
Fallen royals vs. the eternal reign of King Jesus
The removal of former Prince Andrew’s royal titles and privileges has been the story of the week, and I suspect …