Science and faith united
Christians in Science (CiS) has hosted a conference at St Johns College, Durham (and online) to address the issue of science and religion in dialogue rather than conflict, with a keynote talk from Professor Bob White of the University of Cambridge.
The conference bought together many UK-based science-faith involved organisations such as CiS, Equipping Christian Leadership in an Age of Science, the Faraday Institute for Science and Religion, ‘God and the Big Bang’ (which runs interactive workshops for school students) and UCCF, the student Christian group, plus others. Presentations ranged from connecting with students, to talking science-faith in schools or with church audiences as well as discussing practical ways of sharing resources, experiences and skills. These were interspersed with networking times and an exhibition so that attendees were able get to know each other more deeply.
Scientists backtrack on Adam and Eve
An internationally-known thinktank run by evangelical scientists has reversed its view on the literal existence of Adam and Eve.
BioLogos – which has been endorsed by influential voices such as Tim Keller, former bishop Tom Wright, and Fuller professor Richard Mouw – used to maintain that a literal Adam and Eve were scientifically impossible and that all humans could not have come from a single couple. They have now backtracked on that.
Technology
Pro-science, but pro-wisdom!
Much is made of the information overload of the modern era.
With the 24/7 news cycle, multiple feeds, and social media, we have a proliferation of information. This has been an exaggerated feature of the pandemic: endless Covid ‘live feeds’, whether it is ‘second wave updates LIVE’ or ‘vaccine roll-out LIVE’. Commentators then perpetuate this with near-instant reflections on these live updates.
Is this what happens when science rejects faith?
There is a neuroscientist called Eliezer Masliah. He researched dementia and other similar diseases for reputable bodies in the United States, and produced many studies published in prestigious journals.
However the journal Science came to have concerns about some of his research, and set up an investigation. Work that Masliah had published between 1997 and 2023 was scrutinised - in particular, images used to provide evidence for research findings were analysed.