Heresy? ‘Heretic’? Really?

Michael Haykin  |  Features  |  history
Date posted:  1 Apr 2024
Share Add       
Heresy? ‘Heretic’? Really?

image: miquelmontllo.blogspot.com

I have long believed that significant care must be taken when using the word ‘heresy’.

It is causally thrown around with, it appears to me, little reflection on the implications of its assignation. If I say someone is teaching heresy, then I am calling that person a heretic. And heresy is a damnable sin (see 2 Peter 2:1; cf. 1 Timothy 4:1-5).

In recent days, I have read on Facebook of the heresy of ‘continuationism’ – the possibility of the ongoing existence of the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit – with regard to John Piper’s embrace of it, and that John Piper was, by extension, a heretic. This view, of course, would damn all Pentecostals and charismatics!

Share
< Previous article| Features| Next article >
Read more articles on:   history
Read more articles by Michael Haykin >>
Features
Nicaea: The scene is set

Nicaea: The scene is set

In the early 320s, the political relationship between the co-emperors of the Roman Empire, Constantine and Licinus, was falling apart. …

Features
The run-up to Nicaea: Athanasius versus Arius

The run-up to Nicaea: Athanasius versus Arius

Among the three or four most significant theological controversies in the history of the church is the fourth-century struggle with …

Looking for a job?

Browse all our current job adverts

Search

Need to advertise?

We can help you reach Christians across the country

Find out more