Heresy? ‘Heretic’? Really?

Michael Haykin  |  Features  |  history
Date posted:  1 Apr 2024
Share Add       
Heresy? ‘Heretic’? Really?

image: miquelmontllo.blogspot.com

I have long believed that significant care must be taken when using the word ‘heresy’.

It is causally thrown around with, it appears to me, little reflection on the implications of its assignation. If I say someone is teaching heresy, then I am calling that person a heretic. And heresy is a damnable sin (see 2 Peter 2:1; cf. 1 Timothy 4:1-5).

In recent days, I have read on Facebook of the heresy of ‘continuationism’ – the possibility of the ongoing existence of the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit – with regard to John Piper’s embrace of it, and that John Piper was, by extension, a heretic. This view, of course, would damn all Pentecostals and charismatics!

Share
< Previous article| Features| Next article >
Read more articles on:   history
Read more articles by Michael Haykin >>
Features
Daniel McPhail: The  reluctant pastor of Osgoode

Daniel McPhail: The reluctant pastor of Osgoode

It was during the Ottawa Valley revival of 1834–1835, which was narrated in last month’s column, that the Scottish-Canadian, Daniel …

Features
Daniel McPhail: A man of continual prayer

Daniel McPhail: A man of continual prayer

It was in the depths of a Canadian winter – on 17 February, 1836 – that various delegates from six …

About en

Our vision, values and history

Read more

Subscribe

Enjoy our monthly paper and full online access from just £18/year

Find out more