Heresy? ‘Heretic’? Really?

Michael Haykin  |  Features  |  history
Date posted:  1 Apr 2024
Share Add       
Heresy? ‘Heretic’? Really?

image: miquelmontllo.blogspot.com

I have long believed that significant care must be taken when using the word ‘heresy’.

It is causally thrown around with, it appears to me, little reflection on the implications of its assignation. If I say someone is teaching heresy, then I am calling that person a heretic. And heresy is a damnable sin (see 2 Peter 2:1; cf. 1 Timothy 4:1-5).

In recent days, I have read on Facebook of the heresy of ‘continuationism’ – the possibility of the ongoing existence of the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit – with regard to John Piper’s embrace of it, and that John Piper was, by extension, a heretic. This view, of course, would damn all Pentecostals and charismatics!

Share
< Previous article| Features| Next article >
Read more articles on:   history
Read more articles by Michael Haykin >>
Features
The run-up to Nicaea: Athanasius versus Arius

The run-up to Nicaea: Athanasius versus Arius

Among the three or four most significant theological controversies in the history of the church is the fourth-century struggle with …

Features
Before the creed of Nicaea

Before the creed of Nicaea

This year is the 1,700th anniversary of one of the great turning-points in church history, the Council of Nicaea (325), …

About en

Our vision, values and history

Read more

New here?

Register and get three free articles each month!

Register