How should Christians disagree?

Michael Haykin  |  Features  |  history
Date posted:  1 Jul 2021
Share Add       
How should Christians  disagree?

Photo: Sincerely Media on Unsplash

At the outset of his invasion of Scotland in the summer of 1650, Oliver Cromwell remarked that theological disagreements (and surely he is thinking in part of the differences among the English and Scottish Puritans that had led them to war) are endemic to the life of the church in a world marred by sin.

Disagreements are a sad reality with which Christians have to contend. Nonetheless, Christians can control the way that they participate in such disputes.

Disagreeing over the cross

Jump forward now to the close of the next century and one such disagreement between Abraham Booth and Andrew Fuller – the two most important English Baptist theologians between 1770 and the late-19th century – about the vital matter of the atonement and its extent.

Share
< Previous article| Features| Next article >
Read more articles on:   unity  /  history
Read more articles by Michael Haykin >>
Features
The run-up to Nicaea: Athanasius versus Arius

The run-up to Nicaea: Athanasius versus Arius

Among the three or four most significant theological controversies in the history of the church is the fourth-century struggle with …

Features
Before the creed of Nicaea

Before the creed of Nicaea

This year is the 1,700th anniversary of one of the great turning-points in church history, the Council of Nicaea (325), …

Subscribe

Enjoy our monthly paper and full online access from just £18/year

Find out more

About en

Our vision, values and history

Read more