Evangelicals Now
Christian news worldwide
magnifying glass Search archives
home Home check the archives Archives Subscribe Subscriptions Advertising Information & booking of classifieds Adverts Find a local evangelical Church Find a church for the search engines and extremely curious! About us Contact us Site Map
Printable
Version

Getting the gospel right

Why Wright is wrong

GETTING THE GOSPEL RIGHT
Assessing the Reformation and the New Perspectives on Paul
By Cornelius P. Venema
Banner of Truth. 92 pages. £5.50
ISBN 0 85151 927 X

Martin Luther described the doctrine of justification by faith as the belief by which the church stands or falls. Given its central place in evangelical belief its comes as no surprise that from time to time it comes under some form of attack.

During the last few decades that attack has come in the guise of ‘New Perspectives’. Its origins can be traced back to E.P. Sanders’s seminal work Paul and Palestinian Judaism, in which Sanders argued against the common misunderstanding (in his view) of Judaism in the New Testament period as being one driven by ‘a righteousness of works’. He argued instead that the contemporary literature reflects a belief in salvation by grace, but one that stayed in the covenantal community by obedience to the law. This he dubbed ‘covenantal nomism’. More recently this thesis has been developed by two notable British scholars, J.D.G. Dunn and N.T. Wright, Bishop of Durham. Dunn argues that Paul’s main objection to Judaism was its Jewish exclusivism, and that the works of the law served as boundary markers, not that keeping the law was a means of procuring God’s favour. Wright takes this further and cites perverted nationalism as the problem Paul addresses, especially in Galatians, and that the ‘righteousness of God’ refers to God acting on behalf of the needy, not something which is imputed to Christian believers. For Wright the main issue is not a soteriological one (how are we put right with God?), but an ecclesiological one (to which group do we properly belong?).

All this is clearly at variance with the classic Reformed understanding. In this marvellous little book, Venema succinctly and fairly summarises the position of the advocates of the New Perspective, compares their teachings with those of the Reformers and the Bible, and finds them wanting.

This is a brilliant and helpful introduction to the whole debate, with some useful references to more substantial works. It is simple without ever being simplistic and is to be highly recommended.

Melvin Tinker,
Vicar of St. John’s, Newland, Hull